Iko Roofing Lawsuit

Iko roofing shingle products liability litigation case no.

Iko roofing lawsuit. We mention this upfront because the lawsuits appear. 2 09 md 02104 in the u s. Machine fibers ltd for the alleged negligent design and manufacture of iko organic shingles. Iko warranted and represented that the shingles now known to be defective conformed to and had.

Lawsuits allege that iko s organic roofing shingles are defective and prone to moisture invasion. This class action lawsuit claims that iko cambridge ar roof shingles are defective and prone to premature blistering tearing cracking delamination granule loss degradation and loss of adhesion at the seal strip between adjacent shingles. The plaintiffs claimed that the shingles were defective and tended to crack curl blister fishmouth claw discolor break or otherwise not. A settlement has been reached in the litigation.

The company is the target of class action lawsuits in the us and canada. District court for the central district of illinois. The representative plaintiff on behalf of himself and the class claimed damages from the defendants iko industries ltd canroof corporation inc and i g. Average iko consumer ratings are poor dragged down by widespread failure of organic shingles and the cambridge ar line.

This settlement resolves a long hard fought combined class action against a number of iko companies who manufactured or sold certain organic asphalt roofing shingles primarily between 1978 and 2008.